Responding to the Senate’s questioning of ASIC’s public interest immunity claims, Finance Minister Katy Gallagher called out Senator Andrew Bragg for “political grandstanding”.
Mr Bragg has made repeated criticisms of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) over its refusal to provide documents to the Senate economics references committee’s inquiry into the regulator’s investigation and enforcement activities, stating that the Senate “cannot properly investigate ASIC whilst it continues to obfuscate”.
An interim report tabled in the Senate in June by the committee, which has been investigating ASIC enforcement since last year, rejected 11 of 13 claims for public interest immunity made by ASIC chair Joe Longo.
The report highlighted that while posing over 100 inquiries regarding investigations, including the scrutiny of forensic data software company Nuix and laboratory firm ALS, the committee encountered 13 claims of public interest immunity, which it had assessed as a deliberate attempt to undermine its inquiry.
The committee made an official recommendation in the Senate that ASIC provide the documents, with a deadline set for 18 July. ASIC did not supply the committee with the information, leading to Mr Bragg, who serves as chair of the committee, releasing a statement taking aim at the regulator.
Ahead of Ms Gallagher fronting up to the Senate, Mr Bragg again urged the Labor government to act.
“With the support of the executive government, ASIC has treated the Senate with contempt since we established our ASIC Inquiry last October. We cannot do our work whilst this secrecy continues,” Mr Bragg said in a statement.
“It is disappointing that the executive government believes that ASIC should be beyond reproach. The executive government should support our inquiry to build a strong corporate regulator and end white collar crime in Australia.
“The minister representing the Treasurer, Katy Gallagher, by Order of the Senate, is now required to explain to the Senate why ASIC has failed to comply with our orders.”
Responding to the claims in the Senate on Wednesday afternoon, Ms Gallagher said that ASIC was within its rights to withhold the documents on “several grounds”, including the possibility of prejudicing ongoing investigation or enforcement matters, concern over publicly disclosing ASIC law enforcement methodologies, possible prejudice to third parties’ privacy and reputation, and possible disclosure of privileged legal advice.
“To be clear, neither I nor the Treasurer nor the Assistant Treasurer have seen the relevant documents and there is good reason for that. As an independent regulator, ASIC only shares confidential investigative information with the government in the very rare event, that it is necessary and appropriate to do so,” Ms Gallagher told the Senate.
“As the Senate will be aware, the government is precluded from giving ASIC directions under Section 12 of the ASIC Act about particular cases. So, the circumstances in which it will be necessary and appropriate to share with the government documents that relate to particular enforcement matters will be extremely rare.”
The minister added that ASIC told the committee at a public hearing on 23 June that it is “difficult for ASIC to publicly explain the specific harm that would be caused by publishing a document without revealing exactly the information that creates the harm”.
“I’m advised ASIC has offered the committee an in camera briefing to allow ASIC to discuss their PII claim further and makes further submissions using non-confidential information that help explain the context of the enforcement matters of interest to the committee,” Ms Gallagher said.
“I understand the chair, Senator Bragg, has rejected this proposal without explanation. I reiterate, we cannot provide these documents as we do not have them nor have we seen them. I suggest to Senator Bragg and the Senate that the in camera briefing offered is the most appropriate next step to allow the committee to assess ASIC’s concerns.
“If Senator Bragg continues to insist upon the release of these documents in spite of this offer, then that will show that he is only interested in political grandstanding and media headlines.”
In response, Mr Bragg said the Senate committee was seeking to bring transparency to ASIC’s investigations.
“I think it is very regrettable that the government that was elected on the basis of being transparent and having a connection to integrity, wants all this to be done in secret,” he told the Senate.
“ASIC, of course, want to do all its meetings with the committee in secret, even though these are closed files because they don’t want to have any scrutiny on why they haven’t put people in jail. Why they haven’t been able to secure civil penalties, why all these people break these laws and get away with it.
“And I think that is really the sickness here, that we are trying to do this in sunlight and the government through Minister Gallagher and the Treasurer and Minister Jones are seeking to support ASIC’s objective to keep it all in the dark to stop the inquiry and for it to all go away.”
The SMSF Association is the latest body to push for the inclusion of managed investment schemes in the CSLR; however, ...
While the rules around the tax deductibility of advice fees were technically updated in December 2023, the profession ...
Financial adviser at Complete Wealth, Dr Ben Neilson, explains how advisers have improved their perceived value over the ...
Never miss the stories that impact the industry.
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin