-
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
Powered by
MOMENTUM
MEDIA
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
EXCLUSIVE Super funds could soon begin attracting thousands of financial advisers with big salaries and no compliance headaches, creating major issues for embattled licensees.
As major changes around superannuation tax heat up in Canberra, the government will soon turn its attention to an adjacent issue: affordable financial advice.
No announcements have yet been made on Michelle Levy’s recommendations, but the move to create a simpler system for superannuation funds to provide advice is expected to gain support.
Asendium co-founder and CEO Scott Miller, a former financial planner, believes the report could see advisers transition from their businesses. But rather than exit the industry, he says, they may join the super funds.
“Licensees are facing a major problem,” Mr Miller told ifa. “If they don’t start making it easier for advisers to provide advice, planners may see attractive job openings at super funds and leave licensees to go to the product provider.”
Super funds are already providing advice in many ways. Cbus provided more than 28,000 SoAs last year, Australian Super around 8,000, and REST over 19,000 SoAs from 25,000 digital advice interactions.
Mr Miller believes that, if enacted, the Quality of Advice review recommendations could trigger a hiring spree for the industry super funds who are looking to re-enter the advice industry.
“If that passes, imagine how many super funds will put out job adverts for planners. They could put out a job ad with a very attractive salary package. If I’m a planner on $120,000 a year dealing with an absolute headache with compliance and working in outdated systems, I could go over there to not only support my family on a good package, but to continue in the profession in providing quality advice within that institution through their comprehensive advice channel,” he said.
“Licensees could soon be battling product providers for the talent of planners post QAR if they don’t seek to make it easier for their planners to provide advice.”
Industry fund UniSuper has one of the more sophisticated financial advice offerings among product providers. It currently employs 76 planners and produced 42,571 statements of advice (SoAs) last year.
It offers three different types of advice: general, select, and comprehensive.
UniSuper’s general advice offering is free, and allows members to learn about their super and other products on offer.
‘Select’ advice is for contribution and investment strategies or to review insurance attached to a UniSuper account. This costs between $80 and $120.
Finally, UniSuper also offers comprehensive financial planning, which covers retirement planning, non-super investment, debt management, personal insurance, government benefits and aged care. It costs $310 an hour.
Some of the funds UniSuper planners advise on include AustralianSuper, Aware Super, HESTA, QSuper, Super SA, UniSuper, VicSuper, HostPlus, PSS, SASS and West State Super.
Never miss the stories that impact the industry.
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
Comments (24)
"Industry fund UniSuper has one of the more sophisticated financial advice offerings among product providers. It currently employs 76 planners and produced 42,571 statements of advice (SoAs) last year."
IMO, that is some serious product figures - and Michelle Levy wants to make it easier for Product Manufacturers specifically. Financial Planners not likely to be needed under best interest.
Wonder what % of the time the in house product is recommended?
Wonder if the in house product is paying bonuses or similar?
Wonder if any product manufacturers help with office space rents or equipment?
Wonder if any product manufacturers subsidise the provision of this personal advice?
Has ASIC ever investigated these issues at this end of town?
Very limited advice offered
Nothing like self employed advisers
$120000 is a low base income and it will not attract quality mature advisers
There will always be a place for both, but sadly, just like most people who get their car serviced by a dealer don't understand it's a tick and flick service, most people who use an industry fund and their advisers also don't understand what they're not getting too. People don't know what they don't know, and that's okay, because there's not enough of us advisers to meet the need of smart people as it is, let alone the rest of the population.
Or is it the case that you simply believe these people "most people who use an industry fund and their advisers also don't understand what they're not getting too." don't serve better - sort of like a second class type of person not worth?
Wow.
Perhaps Superannuation should be voluntary, that way, like a Toyota example, people have a choice.
You really are missing the point. Uni Super Planners appear to be / are doing 560 SOA's each per year.
If real financial planners could operate under that sort of compliance (it looks to be very different - or perhaps rule don't apply), then nearly 9 million SOA's could be provided - now that would put a dent in the FUM of Union Super - I suspected that is the real issue and the reason Financial Planners appear to have been targeted by Treasury and ASIC - and thanks to Liberals - Financial Planners not directly controlled by Union Super have reduced in numbers. But of course, I could be wrong.
Hang on Financial Advice Association to the rescue! just in time!
What appears to be appetising at first & satisfies a need, quickly results in a feeling that maybe spending a bit more time and money having the proper stuff would have been a better choice.