Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
  • subs-bellGet the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin

‘Uncertainty’ surrounding government’s education proposal could see more advisers exit

The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has flagged a major area of concern with government’s recent proposal for changes to the education and training standard for financial advisers.

In its submission to Treasury this week on the Education Standards for Financial Advisers policy paper – which proposed a pathway coined the “experience pathway” that streamlines the minimum education requirements and recognises on-the-job experience for individuals with 10 or more years of full-time experience – the industry group said the news has already impacted the decision-making of many advisers.

“We are concerned by this, and are very conscious of the additional uncertainty that this announcement has generated,” the submission read.

“It is important to note that there are still a substantial number of financial advisers with significant additional study required in order to comply with the FASEA standard by 1 January 2026. Some are yet to commence their study. The longer this uncertainty lasts, the greater risk posed that these advisers may not be able to complete the required study in time.”

The AFA also noted the drop in the number of advisers in Australia, which shrank below 19,000 late last year and is predicted to reach 13,000 by the end of 2023.

To combat this, the AFA argued the exodus of experienced advisers can be “positively influenced” by better recognition of prior education and that government’s proposal could change the mind of many who have decided not to undertake further study.

In the submission, the AFA recommended that anyone who has already passed the FASEA standard should not be required to do any further study and that any existing advisers should be able to choose whether they stick with the existing standard or pursue one of the pathways outlined in the proposal.

“The reality is that there have already been a large number of experienced advisers who have left the profession,” it read.

“Some of them might have completed the exam and could therefore come back. Others will not have completed the exam and thus a return would not be possible. For a large number of them, this change will have come too late to influence their decision to leave the financial advice profession.”

The submission comes after The Advisers Association chief executive Neil Macdonald said late last year that if the education requirement issue is not urgently addressed, the advice sector will experience a “mass exodus” by 2026.

Neil Griffiths

Neil Griffiths

Neil is the Deputy Editor of the wealth titles, including ifa and InvestorDaily.

Neil is also the host of the ifa show podcast.

Comments (12)

avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is 10MB. Only gif,jpg,png files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
  • Seriously? I know I speak on behalf of many advisers and am echoing previous sentiment but the train really has left the station. If you haven’t started any form of study then quite frankly you don’t deserve to be here. We should worry less about losing advisers (who most likely need to go) and focus on how to create an environment where customers have an impetus to see an adviser. Now is the time to be collectively lobbying for real change that will inspire customer action eg sadly something like tax deductibility comes to mind…wouldn’t that be a massive win? But no we’ll keep banging on about the poor adviser who can’t get their act together and get with the program. You want a profession then draw a very hard line in the sand. 2026 sound like a plan.
    0
  • Get the old Advisers who cut corners, signed clients up for ongoing fees but never provided any further advice, haven't done a lick of retraining in 20 years, get them out. These cowboys still believe buying a house, hey it's not a financial product so I don't have to declare referral fee. Put them on the old leathered horses they rode in on and let them go out the industry.
    -1
  • Be less than 10k in 2026 Thursday, 03 February 2022
    There was no uncertainty prior to them changing the education standards -- the requirements were flawed but were understood. The issue with financial planning is not the educational standards it is the fact that the job is crap due to the amount of compliance which adds nothing to the client experience and doing anything whilst ignoring this fact is a waste of time.
    4
  • With regards to how do we save our industry, I'll save our inept government, ASIC and lawmakers time with a few very simple points.
    To become a profession simply copy the medical profession
    - Doctors are not licensed by or use an APL provided by a drug company. They are self-licensed via their
    association
    - Drug companies don't own the medical practice. Many large licensees have a significant interest in some of our
    large’s practices.
    - Doctors use their professional judgement to make recommendations and don’t confuse the patient with a 90 page
    advice document (they use a prescription pad)
    - They follow a code of ethics plus legislated rules and regulations, unlike our industry they don’t have the overlay
    of a licensee’s interpretation of the various rules and regs
    - Do anything wrong then you front a panel of your peers for a fair hearing and not a system which is biased
    towards the adviser, costs the client nothing and is not binding on the client if the adviser is found not at fault.

    The clock is ticking, time to approach the industry with a blank piece of paper
    12
  • It is an absolute mess.
    0
  • I am 66, and still love being in this industry! Primary because of the wonderful long term client and staff relationships I still treasure.
    However, I am also frustrated beyond belief when I look at the chronic disconnect policy/lawmakers have with financial planning.
    To al you younger advisers I say hang in there, it will get better!
    For me, tic tic tic………
    4
  • My job is now 90% compliance and 10% advice. It is not about the advice anymore it is about proving it, ticking a box, making sure we cover all the legislation requirements.

    Every day I fail FASEA code of Ethic - to act efficiently. How can we be efficient when we have stupid rules and regulations designed by lawyers, academics and politicians. At this stage I will be leaving in 2026 even though I pass the new education standards of 10 years (25 years) and completed the FASEA code of ethic unit and pass the exam.

    The whole system is just too hard and not about the advice anymore
    17
  • Politicians have shown they know zero regarding the profession. The raft of bandaids introduced with zero structure make every adviser an easy target for the legal profession. SMSF s will be a major concern going forward. It is a dogs breakfast with compliance at present with no real beneficial outcome for clients and advisers. Sadly there are many departed the industry already and more to come. The risks and fines are way too high to hang around. Don’t be fooled by any promises from any political party, hang in at your peril.
    9
  • I'm leaving in 2026. I have 4 units to complete.

    At age 52 with 34 continuous years of CPD and other studies, I feel let down by politicians and the industry.

    The compluance risks associated with being employed in this industry is simply not worth it.
    31
    • I hear you! 100% :)
      7
    • Yep, I hear what you are saying. I have had my CFP since March 2000 with all the education and experience that it carries with it, and yet I am somehow a danger to the industry. Who know that a career that started with such hope, will be derailed by numpties with clipboards and bad attitudes.
      3