The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has flagged a major area of concern with government’s recent proposal for changes to the education and training standard for financial advisers.
In its submission to Treasury this week on the Education Standards for Financial Advisers policy paper – which proposed a pathway coined the “experience pathway” that streamlines the minimum education requirements and recognises on-the-job experience for individuals with 10 or more years of full-time experience – the industry group said the news has already impacted the decision-making of many advisers.
“We are concerned by this, and are very conscious of the additional uncertainty that this announcement has generated,” the submission read.
“It is important to note that there are still a substantial number of financial advisers with significant additional study required in order to comply with the FASEA standard by 1 January 2026. Some are yet to commence their study. The longer this uncertainty lasts, the greater risk posed that these advisers may not be able to complete the required study in time.”
The AFA also noted the drop in the number of advisers in Australia, which shrank below 19,000 late last year and is predicted to reach 13,000 by the end of 2023.
To combat this, the AFA argued the exodus of experienced advisers can be “positively influenced” by better recognition of prior education and that government’s proposal could change the mind of many who have decided not to undertake further study.
In the submission, the AFA recommended that anyone who has already passed the FASEA standard should not be required to do any further study and that any existing advisers should be able to choose whether they stick with the existing standard or pursue one of the pathways outlined in the proposal.
“The reality is that there have already been a large number of experienced advisers who have left the profession,” it read.
“Some of them might have completed the exam and could therefore come back. Others will not have completed the exam and thus a return would not be possible. For a large number of them, this change will have come too late to influence their decision to leave the financial advice profession.”
The submission comes after The Advisers Association chief executive Neil Macdonald said late last year that if the education requirement issue is not urgently addressed, the advice sector will experience a “mass exodus” by 2026.
Neil is the Deputy Editor of the wealth titles, including ifa and InvestorDaily.
Neil is also the host of the ifa show podcast.
Never miss the stories that impact the industry.
Comments (12)
To become a profession simply copy the medical profession
- Doctors are not licensed by or use an APL provided by a drug company. They are self-licensed via their
association
- Drug companies don't own the medical practice. Many large licensees have a significant interest in some of our
large’s practices.
- Doctors use their professional judgement to make recommendations and don’t confuse the patient with a 90 page
advice document (they use a prescription pad)
- They follow a code of ethics plus legislated rules and regulations, unlike our industry they don’t have the overlay
of a licensee’s interpretation of the various rules and regs
- Do anything wrong then you front a panel of your peers for a fair hearing and not a system which is biased
towards the adviser, costs the client nothing and is not binding on the client if the adviser is found not at fault.
The clock is ticking, time to approach the industry with a blank piece of paper
However, I am also frustrated beyond belief when I look at the chronic disconnect policy/lawmakers have with financial planning.
To al you younger advisers I say hang in there, it will get better!
For me, tic tic tic………
Every day I fail FASEA code of Ethic - to act efficiently. How can we be efficient when we have stupid rules and regulations designed by lawyers, academics and politicians. At this stage I will be leaving in 2026 even though I pass the new education standards of 10 years (25 years) and completed the FASEA code of ethic unit and pass the exam.
The whole system is just too hard and not about the advice anymore
At age 52 with 34 continuous years of CPD and other studies, I feel let down by politicians and the industry.
The compluance risks associated with being employed in this industry is simply not worth it.