Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
  • subs-bellGet the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin

ANZ rejects criticism on remediation progress

ANZ has revealed further details of its advice remediation processes following questions from a parliamentary committee around the speed of its efforts to refund customers.

The major bank, which sold its advice business to IOOF in 2017 but assumed liability in the deal for historical remediation, told a public hearing of the House economics committee on Friday that it was currently employing more than 1,000 staff to work on remediation.

ANZ chief executive Shayne Elliott refuted questioning from committee deputy chair Andrew Leigh around the bank employing consultants “to see how you could make the payments slower”, saying it was in ANZ’s interest to remediate customers as quickly as possible.

“We have no interest in slowing down payments, it’s not in our interest to make those payments slower – in fact it comes at a considerable cost,” Mr Elliott said.

“We have over 1,000 people at ANZ working on remediation, our shareholders have already taken the accounting hit and it’s in our interest to get it behind us.”

The comments come following ASIC’s appearance at the same committee last month, during which the regulator’s deputy chair Karen Chester called out delays with the big four banks’ remediation programs and suggested too many of their financial resources were going towards the payment of external consultants.

“We are seeing green shoots in terms of the culture within some large institutions, but we will be consulting around what our expectations are for remediation programs going forward, focusing on things like transparency and how many cents in the dollar is going through to the consumer versus paying consultants,” Ms Chester said at the time.

==
==

Mr Elliott said the bank currently employed 10 consultants to advise on remediation processes and expected to reduce this number in the near future.

“At last look we had 10 consultants, and by the end of September that will be reduced further. Certainly we’re not doing that to slow it down, we’re doing it to speed it up,” he said.

“It’s complicated because you are going back to an individual’s account from five, seven, 10 years ago and you need to get all the data. We didn’t have the same systems and tools then, so you have to run through the entire 10-year history and recreate the account as if the right level of fees applied. 

“That has to be done name by name, so sadly we are having to [remediate] millions of customers and we are getting it done as early as we can.”

ASIC estimated to the committee in August that $2.99 billion was still to be refunded across the big four banks as a result of poor advice or fees for no service.

However, Mr Elliott said ANZ was determined not to rush through the process and risk making further costly errors. 

“The last thing we want to be doing, and we saw this in the royal commission, if banks act quickly and don’t do things properly it can end up a real mess,” he said. 

“The amount of money we are getting back to customers is starting to increase at a geometric rate and that will continue.”