Appearing before a hearing of the federal parliament’s economic standing committee on Friday, CBA chairman Catherine Livingstone and outgoing chief executive Ian Narev faced a gruelling cross-examination over the ongoing allegations of non-compliance with money laundering laws brought by government agency Austrac.
Inquiry chairman and Coalition MP David Coleman pressed Ms Livingstone on why the bank did not raise the matter publicly prior to Austrac’s intervention despite its board of directors reportedly becoming aware of the issue in 2015.
Mr Coleman, a former McKinsey consultant and Yellow Brick Road board director before entering Parliament, said he was concerned that the “reputational issue” facing the bank, rather than its approach to compliance with money laundering and anti-terrorism regulations, are the top priority for the board.
“Surely the board has failed to act within its legal duty to act in the best interests of the company,” Mr Coleman said, pointing in particular to the share price drop that occurred in the wake of the Austrac announcement.
“This was the largest example of shareholder destruction [of] value in Australian history,” Mr Coleman accused.
In addition, he criticised Ms Livingstone, who was named as chairman of the bank in January 2017, for omitting any reference to the Austrac matter in the company’s half-yearly report to shareholders. The experienced business leader and board director replied that the report was compliant with all relevant disclosure requirements.
Mr Narev’s performance also came under fire from the inquiry chairman, with Mr Coleman questioning the lack of executive terminations relating to the Austrac matter.
“Surely you have turned your mind to who, at the group executive level, needs to be held to account … haven’t you been derelict in your duty as CEO if no group executive has been made accountable?” Mr Coleman asked.
While Mr Narev said he and Ms Livingstone needed to be “circumspect” about speaking too freely given the ongoing civil proceedings with Austrac, he admitted that he had considered the issue of executive accountability.
Ms Livingstone announced that there may yet be consequences for relevant staff members as the investigations continue.
“I can assure the committee that, as we do the work to understand the underlying causes and issues there will be further accountability consequences as necessary,” she said.
The Peter Principal in all its glory.
They say they want to build trust.
They don’t realise that outright lying does not build trust.
They said there was extra stuff in the AUSTRAC allegation that they did not know about. None of that matters. Ignore the extra stuff. They said they were fully aware of the 53 000 TTR that were not reported over a period of more than 2 years. The maximum fine for these is $960billion. Assume the bank only has to pay 1% of this maximum. That is still $9.6b, a full year’s profit, that’s material and was not disclosed.
They have not met continuous disclosure!
A 5 year old can work out they did not meet.
“accountability consequences” except for them…some poor schlep further down the pecking order will wind up being the sacrificial lamb…whilst Narev walks away with pockets full of dough