According to ifa’s recent poll, 55.6 per cent of participants have not begun transitioning to meet the new adviser education requirements, while 44.4 said they have begun.
Speaking to ifa in response to confusion around what steps advisers must take to begin meeting the new requirements, Mr Marshan said, “There is an expectation that most planners will only have to do a portion of bridging courses and therefore waiting until there is some certainty is probably a good way to make sure they are doing exactly what they need to be doing.
“We still don’t have the legislation passed through parliament.
“We also need the standards body to be set up and their framework for what these new education standards will look like to be established. Until there is some certainty, anyone who wants to start something is starting in the dark,” he said.
Mr Marshan added that the FPA has offered its Financial Planning Education Council (FPEC) curriculum to the government.
“We expect that FPEC would form most of the curriculum, so if anyone wants to get a headstart on doing a course that meets those requirements – it’s most likely that the FPEC curriculum will get them most of the way to meeting those transition arrangements.”
The education bill was introduced into parliament in November 2016. The proposed law includes compulsory education requirements for both new and existing financial advisers, supervision requirements for new advisers as well as a code of ethics for the industry.
The bill will also mandate an exam that will represent a common benchmark across the industry and an ongoing professional development component, the statement said.
The new professional standards regime will start on 1 January 2019, whereby new advisers entering the industry will be required to hold a relevant degree.
Existing financial advisers will have access to transitional arrangements allowing them two years, until 1 January 2021, to pass the exam, and five years, until 1 January 2024, to meet the education requirements.
ifa reported in November that a recommendation from the FPA regarding the mandatory exam did not make it into the final draft because of “politics”.
It becomes very apparent that no one knows what is going on or what is required.
So those who believe their current qualifications are adequate, may be in for a surprise.
About time someone grew a brain and came up with a system that we can work with, otherwise there will be a need to grant further time extensions. And those that are way out of the arena, resign and become a politician and go pick on another profession.
The Industry needs to sack the FPA. Problems solved.
I bow to your intelligence, succinct, perfectly worded. you are a poet
some of the most surprised will be old accountants who haven’t got a degree and have been grandfathered. system is unworkable, a farce, everyone knows it.