Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
  • subs-bellGet the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin

Industry fund FOFA carve-outs under the knife

The opt-in and fee disclosure exemptions for industry funds agreed to by the previous government may become history if the government’s FOFA amendments are blocked in the Senate.

Finance minister Mathias Cormann yesterday announced that if the government’s negotiations with the micro-party and Palmer United Party senators are not successful, then he may consider broadening the bans implicit in the FOFA reforms to the industry super fund sector.

Senator Cormann said the carve-out for industry funds on opt-in and retrospective fee disclosure requirements – secured in what  Senator Cormann described as a “special deal” struck with former financial services minister Bill Shorten – may be terminated in the “interest of competitive neutrality”.

“This is not a threat but a likely consequence of any decision by the Senate to reject our decision to cut unnecessary and costly red tape which pushes up the cost of advice for investors without proportionate improvements in consumer protections,” Senator Cormann said.

“Our preferred course of action is if opt-In and retrospective fee disclosure are scrapped altogether, but if the Senate decides that they should stay, then I think they should stay for everyone providing and charging for advice on the same basis.”

Senator Cormann added, however, that he was looking forward to the negotiations and to the interest taken in the issue by the new Senate members.

Comments (2)

avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is 10MB. Only gif,jpg,png files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as
  • <p>Regardless of what the senate decides, shouldn&amp;#039t the industry be a level playing field? Disclosure is largely the essence of this debate according to David Whitley so why shouldn&amp;#039t the same rules apply to them including how much the industry funds pay to unions as dividends each year? what benefits flow to ultimately to political parties, subsidiaries etc. Granted the CBA situation is disgraceful but let&amp;#039s not forget there&amp;#039s a Royal Commission going on at the moment that&amp;#039s highlighting a lot of similar problems from their end. Shouldn&amp;#039t everyone who doesn&amp;#039t vote Labour be entitled to disclosure for any industry funds they have to ensure their protection?</p>
    0
  • <p>About B****Y time. Cant wait to hear screams of how unfair and unnecessary it is for the unions and their spruiker Bill Shorten.</p>
    0